tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37212943.post7897064427336625264..comments2023-09-09T02:38:28.265-05:00Comments on LDS (Mormonism) Deep Doctrine: Reasons Why Anti-Women Sentiment and Injustice is Rising in our SocietyDoug Towershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17119162546723347214noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37212943.post-42397550026018765632011-07-01T13:02:09.679-05:002011-07-01T13:02:09.679-05:00Anonymous
As the attempt of my post is to point o...Anonymous<br /><br />As the attempt of my post is to point out another side to some of the ideas we are constantly being blasted with by feminists I can understand you feeling I am being anti-women.<br /><br />However, it is a bit like saying that Jesus Christ didn't like Jews because he spoke against some of their false ideas. The mere fact that he bothered preaching to them at all shows that he liked them.<br /><br />In regard Rose you say that I regard they were entitled to rape her because she was "boozing around." But what I really said was that she was part of a deal where guys knew that by buying her drinks they would get sex. She understood this deal. In other words she was virtually a prostitute that had received her payment but decided to renege on her part of the bargain.<br /><br />And, yes, you are right in the obvious observation that she and they shouldn't have been associating for these purposes.<br /><br />Your theory on rape sounds straight out of a textbook. Let me broaden your knowledge, please.<br /><br />Firstly I'd assume you have never witnessed these rapists in the process of attempting to, or raping of, a person. Secondly I'd assume you haven't even interviewed one rapist personally. But, clearly, you've read about it.<br /><br />I have been there as around 20 guys attempted to rape a girl. Let me tell you that for the majority dominance WASN'T their intent.<br /><br />I have interviewed many rapists. Some did it for the sex (sorry, throw that book out). They saw the parts and lusted.<br /><br />Some partly hoped to please the woman with sex and feed the ego. Some of these hoped that a relationship might have then developed.<br /><br />And, yes, some followed the textbook and did it purely for dominance.<br /><br />Some can rape for a distorted sense of love. Again they can be hoping the person will take to them after the experience.<br /><br />You see, people are complex. This extremely simplified version of things that you have quoted is not real.Doug Towershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17119162546723347214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37212943.post-37892943500236841362011-07-01T00:03:18.486-05:002011-07-01T00:03:18.486-05:00I believe you are missing a very vital point. Rape...I believe you are missing a very vital point. Rape is not about sex. It's not even about attraction. Rape happens when one exerts their dominance over another with their penis. It is a violent and cruel act, and devistatingly demeaning to the victim. If your Rose was raped it would not have mattered if she had been boozing around. Someone toke advantage of her position, and felt entitled to dominate her, and from the sounds of it, you feel he was entitled as well. Rapists prey on the weak, whether it is a child, an impressionable young adult, an insecure partner, or even the disabled or autistic. If someone were to violate your body without consent, woudn't you expect retribution? Your piece wrekes of male privilege, and there is nothing so revolting as a man who would defend rape. And after all, those men put themselves in that position *wink, wink* had they been more careful about who they associated with, these aligations would have never been brought to their doorstep. Oh, if only we could have those good ol days back when men knew their place! Barefoot and in the kitchen.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com